[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220125144356.zofft3jd4ov564gd@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:43:56 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andrey@...edev.lt, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm-sun4i: convert "next_period" to local variable
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2022/01/25 15:31, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > I think I'd drop this. This isn't a fix worth on it's own to be
> > backported and if this is needed for one of the next patches, the stable
> > maintainers will notice themselves (and it might be worth to shuffle
> > this series to make the fixes come first).
>
> The first two patches are preparation for the third patch, which fixes
> the actual bug.
>
> Of course, I could have done everything in one patch, but I thought
> splitting the first two out makes review easier. This way, every step
> is almost trivial.
>
> If you want me to fold the three patches into one, I can do that. But
> I can't reorder them (or backport only the bug fix to stable).
That sounds fine. Note my statement "I'd drop this" only refers to the
Cc: stable line.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists