[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eaaffe1-f6aa-4d8f-bbc7-0a57002d1729@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:30:29 -0800
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+af7a719bc92395ee41b3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity
On 1/25/22 01:14, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Could we use :
> set_load_weight(p, !(p->__state & TASK_NEW));
> instead of
> set_load_weight(p, true);
> in set_user_nice and __setscheduler_params.
Wouldn't that require READ_ONCE() and rmb() after the read?
--
Thanks,
Tadeusz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists