linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:30:29 -0800
From:   Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+af7a719bc92395ee41b3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix fault in reweight_entity

On 1/25/22 01:14, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Could we use :
> set_load_weight(p, !(p->__state & TASK_NEW));
> instead of
> set_load_weight(p, true);
> in set_user_nice and __setscheduler_params.

Wouldn't that require READ_ONCE() and rmb() after the read?

-- 
Thanks,
Tadeusz