[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f493e1e7-0fa0-45f6-4bd6-790492055797@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 19:21:12 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: menglong8.dong@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org, fw@...len.de, imagedong@...cent.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, alobakin@...me, paulb@...dia.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, talalahmad@...gle.com, haokexin@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, memxor@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
cong.wang@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: ipv4: use kfree_skb_reason() in
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu()
On 1/24/22 6:15 AM, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 8942d32c0657..603f77ef2170 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -328,6 +328,8 @@ enum skb_drop_reason {
It would be worthwhile to document the meaning of these as you add them
-- long description of the enum.
> SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_RPFILTER,
> SKB_DROP_REASON_EARLY_DEMUX,
> SKB_DROP_REASON_UNICAST_IN_L2_MULTICAST,
/* xfrm policy check failed */
> + SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY,
/* no support for IP protocol */
> + SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_NOPROTO,
> SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX,
> };
>
If the enum is 1:1 with an SNMP counter, just state that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists