[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <308b88bf-7874-4b04-47f7-51203fef4128@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 19:25:10 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: menglong8.dong@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org, fw@...len.de, imagedong@...cent.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, alobakin@...me, paulb@...dia.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, talalahmad@...gle.com, haokexin@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, memxor@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
cong.wang@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: udp: use kfree_skb_reason() in
udp_queue_rcv_one_skb()
On 1/24/22 6:15 AM, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 603f77ef2170..dd64a4f2ff1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ enum skb_drop_reason {
> SKB_DROP_REASON_UNICAST_IN_L2_MULTICAST,
> SKB_DROP_REASON_XFRM_POLICY,
> SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_NOPROTO,
> + SKB_DROP_REASON_UDP_FILTER,
Is there really a need for a UDP and TCP version? why not just:
/* dropped due to bpf filter on socket */
SKB_DROP_REASON_SOCKET_FILTER
> SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX,
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists