linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/31] clk: mediatek: pll: Implement unregister API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220126060449.24874-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:04:49 +0800
From:   Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <wenst@...omium.org>
CC:     <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/31] clk: mediatek: pll: Implement unregister API

> +static void mtk_clk_unregister_pll(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +	struct clk_hw *hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
> +	struct mtk_clk_pll *pll = to_mtk_clk_pll(hw);
> +
> +	clk_unregister(clk);
> +	kfree(pll);
> +}
> +

mtk_clk_unregister_pll() looks different. 
Do we need to check hw before passing it to to_mtk_clk_pll(hw), like
mtk_clk_unregister_mux()?

>  void mtk_clk_register_plls(struct device_node *node,
>  		const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls, struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data)
>  {
> @@ -388,4 +397,44 @@ void mtk_clk_register_plls(struct device_node *node,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_register_plls);
>  
> +static __iomem void *mtk_clk_pll_get_base(struct clk *clk,
> +					  const struct mtk_pll_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct clk_hw *hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
> +	struct mtk_clk_pll *pll = to_mtk_clk_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return pll->base_addr - data->reg;
> +}
> +
> +void mtk_clk_unregister_plls(const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
> +			     struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data)
> +{
> +	__iomem void *base = NULL;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!clk_data)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = num_plls; i > 0; i--) {
> +		const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i - 1];
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->clks[pll->id]))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * This is quite ugly but unfortunately the clks don't have
> +		 * any device tied to them, so there's no place to store the
> +		 * pointer to the I/O region base address. We have to fetch
> +		 * it from one of the registered clks.
> +		 */
> +		base = mtk_clk_pll_get_base(clk_data->clks[pll->id], pll);
> +
> +		mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->clks[pll->id]);
> +		clk_data->clks[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +	}
> +
> +	iounmap(base);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_unregister_plls);
> +
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h
> index d01b0c38311d..a889b1e472e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h
> @@ -51,5 +51,7 @@ struct mtk_pll_data {
>  void mtk_clk_register_plls(struct device_node *node,
>  			   const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
>  			   struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data);
> +void mtk_clk_unregister_plls(const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
> +			     struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data);
>  
>  #endif /* __DRV_CLK_MTK_PLL_H */
> -- 
> 2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog