linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add Quartz64-A sdmmc1 node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:15:13 +0100
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add Quartz64-A sdmmc1 node

Am Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2022, 10:55:13 CET schrieb Peter Geis:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 1:18 AM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/27/22 02:00, Peter Geis wrote:
> > > The sdmmc1 node on Quartz64-A supports the optional wifi module from
> > > Pine64.
> > > Add the sdmmc1 node and requisite sdio_pwrseq to enable wifi support on
> > > the Quartz64-A.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-quartz64-a.dts   | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-quartz64-a.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-quartz64-a.dts
> > > index 33c2c18caaa9..1d73ac6557c5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-quartz64-a.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-quartz64-a.dts
> > > @@ -91,6 +91,18 @@ simple-audio-card,codec {
> > >               };
> > >       };
> > >
> > > +     sdio_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq {
> >
> > > +             status = "okay";
> >
> > When a node is not previously disabled, then there's no need for "okay".
> 
> Thanks, this is here in case an end user wants to easily hack the
> board to use this for other purposes.

but please drop it here as well.

A user "hacking" a devicetree should be able to also just _add_
a status "disabled" :-) .