[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfOVoIQqaXkzDju5@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:05:04 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] cachefiles: Split and rename S_KERNEL_FILE and
extend effects
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:48:06PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Split S_KERNEL_FILE into two separate flags to do two separate jobs and give
> them new names[1][2]:
I strong disagreewith this. The flag is a horrible hack that does not
have any business to exist to start with. Splitting it an potentially
proliferating the use is not a good.
The proper fix would be to fix the cachefiles design to not rely on it
at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists