linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: fbtft: Deduplicate driver registration macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfOYa/vX8cYKQxgo@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:16:59 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Noralf Tronnes <notro@...nnes.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: fbtft: Deduplicate driver registration
 macros

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:36:07PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 06:51:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The two macros FBTFT_REGISTER_DRIVER and FBTFT_REGISTER_SPI_DRIVER
> > contain quite some duplication: Both define an spi driver and an of device
> > table and the differences are quite subtle.
> > 
> > So create two new macros and use both twice.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118181338.207943-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> 
> You picked this patch into your staging-next branch, I guess from the
> original submission. Not sure how Mark wants to continue with the series
> from this thread, but at least my plan was that he will create an
> immutable branch on top of 5.17-rc2 (assuming 5.17-rc2 will contain
> "staging: fbtft: Fix error path in fbtft_driver_module_init()") with the
> remaining 4 patches in this series.

That's fine, I can pull from that.

> In a private mail you agreed to this procedure, but this didn't stop you
> taking this patch?! What is your plan here? The obvious (to me) options
> are:
> 
>  - Delay this series until after the next merge window.
>  - You back out this patch from staging-next and ack here for Mark to
>    apply it to an immutable branch.
>  - You keep this patch in staging-next and still ack here for Mark to
>    apply it to an immutable branch. Then the patch would be included
>    twice.

Included twice is fine, or I can revert it in the staging tree.

Don't let staging tree issues prevent you from doing real work in the
other part of the kernel, I can manage merges and other issues like this
very easily.

thanks,

greg k-h