[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yff152H3FFVdQBfy@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:44:55 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel-team@...com,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/35] mm: separate mmap locked assertion from find_vma
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:09:43AM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> This adds a new __find_vma() function, which implements find_vma minus
> the mmap_assert_locked() assertion.
>
> find_vma() is then implemented as an inline wrapper around __find_vma().
You might like to take inspiration from the maple tree patches
where we assert that either the RCU lock is held or the mmap_lock
is held.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists