linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: fix latent guest entry/exit bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:10:35 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com,
        alexandru.elisei@....com, anup@...infault.org,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, atishp@...shpatra.org,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, bp@...en8.de,
        catalin.marinas@....com, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, frederic@...nel.org,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, james.morse@....com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        joro@...tes.org, maz@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, nsaenzju@...hat.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        paulmck@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        seanjc@...gle.com, suzuki.poulose@....com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, vkuznets@...hat.com,
        wanpengli@...cent.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: fix latent guest entry/exit bugs

On 2/1/22 17:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 04:59:47PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 2/1/22 14:29, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> I've pushed the series (based on v5.17-rc2) to my kvm/entry-rework branch:
>>>
>>>     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=kvm/entry-rework
>>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git kvm/entry-rework
>>
>> Thanks!  I cherry-picked the basic, x86 and mips patches to kvm.git's master
>> branch (I did not use your branch in order to leave arm64 and riscv to the
>> respective maintainers).
> 
> Since everything's dependent upon that core patch, IIUC that's going to make it
> a pain for them to queue things.
> 
> How are you expecting the arm64 and riscv maintainers to queue things? Queue
> their own copies of that core patch?

The kvm.git master branch has a stable commit id, so the KVM/ARM and 
KVM/RISCV maintainers can just base their pull request to me on it. 
Alternatively, if they prefer it that way, I can get it quickly to Linus.

Paolo