[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czk65vhq.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:48:01 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com, alexandru.elisei@....com,
anup@...infault.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, atishp@...shpatra.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, bp@...en8.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, frederic@...nel.org,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, james.morse@....com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, mingo@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
nsaenzju@...hat.com, palmer@...belt.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: fix latent guest entry/exit bugs
On Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:10:35 +0000,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/1/22 17:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 04:59:47PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 2/1/22 14:29, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>> I've pushed the series (based on v5.17-rc2) to my kvm/entry-rework branch:
> >>>
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=kvm/entry-rework
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git kvm/entry-rework
> >>
> >> Thanks! I cherry-picked the basic, x86 and mips patches to kvm.git's master
> >> branch (I did not use your branch in order to leave arm64 and riscv to the
> >> respective maintainers).
> >
> > Since everything's dependent upon that core patch, IIUC that's going to make it
> > a pain for them to queue things.
> >
> > How are you expecting the arm64 and riscv maintainers to queue things? Queue
> > their own copies of that core patch?
>
> The kvm.git master branch has a stable commit id, so the KVM/ARM and
> KVM/RISCV maintainers can just base their pull request to me on
> it. Alternatively, if they prefer it that way, I can get it quickly to
> Linus.
In which case, please add the arm64 patch to the mix. I'm not rebasing
my current queue.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists