linux-kernel - Re: [ASUS EC Sensors v8 0/3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 19:41:27 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ASUS EC Sensors v8 0/3]

On 2/2/22 17:16, Eugene Shalygin wrote:
>> I was waiting for someone to send me a Tested-by: for the series,
> 
> Oleksandr sent an informal one already.
> 

He wrote:

"Given minor changes against v7, I think my "Tested-by:" should have been preserved."

which doesn't mean he tested again, only that in his opinion
the tags should have been preserved.

>> since you dropped the previous feedback.
> 
> Does it mean it is possible to update patches while keeping it?
> 

See above. You are the one to make the call, and you made the call that
the series should be re-tested.

That means that I am left with either accepting the series without any
Tested-by: and/or Reviewed-by: tags, or I have to wait for some. I guess
you are telling me that I won't get any additional tags, so I'll have to
go in myself and have a closer look. I'll try to do that in the next week
or two.

Guenter