[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yfvb6l/8AJJhRXKs@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 05:43:06 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"djwong@...nel.org" <djwong@...nel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"vishal.l.verma@...el.com" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"dave.jiang@...el.com" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"agk@...hat.com" <agk@...hat.com>,
"snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: introduce dax device flag DAXDEV_RECOVERY
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:27:42PM +0000, Jane Chu wrote:
> Yeah, I see. Would you suggest a way to pass the indication from
> dax_iomap_iter to dax_direct_access that the caller intends the
> callee to ignore poison in the range because the caller intends
> to do recovery_write? We tried adding a flag to dax_direct_access, and
> that wasn't liked if I recall.
To me a flag seems cleaner than this magic, but let's wait for Dan to
chime in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists