linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] EDAC/amd64: Set memory type per DIMM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:09:32 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     William Roche <william.roche@...cle.com>
Cc:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org,
        Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] EDAC/amd64: Set memory type per DIMM

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:19:19PM +0100, William Roche wrote:
> As we are moving the dram_type cached date from pvt to umc for family >=
> 0x17, should we also add a small comment for the dram_type field in the
> amd64_pvt structure to indicate that ?

Who would be that comment for? People who are looking at the code, so
that they know which is which?

> Something like that for example:
> 
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
>      /* place to store error injection parameters prior to issue */
>      struct error_injection injection;
> 
> -    /* cache the dram_type */
> +    /* cache the dram_type for family<0x17 */
>      enum mem_type dram_type;
> 
>      struct amd64_umc *umc;    /* UMC registers */
> 
> 
> Just a suggestion.
> The code looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: William Roche <william.roche@...cle.com>
> 
> W.

Btw, I'd appreciate it if you do not top-post.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette