[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfviHFrzzdapbwDt@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:09:32 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: William Roche <william.roche@...cle.com>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org,
Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] EDAC/amd64: Set memory type per DIMM
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:19:19PM +0100, William Roche wrote:
> As we are moving the dram_type cached date from pvt to umc for family >=
> 0x17, should we also add a small comment for the dram_type field in the
> amd64_pvt structure to indicate that ?
Who would be that comment for? People who are looking at the code, so
that they know which is which?
> Something like that for example:
>
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
> /* place to store error injection parameters prior to issue */
> struct error_injection injection;
>
> - /* cache the dram_type */
> + /* cache the dram_type for family<0x17 */
> enum mem_type dram_type;
>
> struct amd64_umc *umc; /* UMC registers */
>
>
> Just a suggestion.
> The code looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: William Roche <william.roche@...cle.com>
>
> W.
Btw, I'd appreciate it if you do not top-post.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists