[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220204093734.GA27857@amd>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:37:35 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 08/25] perf: Rework perf_event_exit_event()
Hi!
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> commit ef54c1a476aef7eef26fe13ea10dc090952c00f8 upstream.
>
> Make perf_event_exit_event() more robust, such that we can use it from
> other contexts. Specifically the up and coming remove_on_exec.
Do we need this in 5.10? AFAICT the remove_on_exec work is not queued
for 5.10, and this patch is buggy and needs following one to fix it
up.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists