linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 08/25] perf: Rework perf_event_exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yfz0nWtyap5Y3ogJ@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:40:45 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 08/25] perf: Rework perf_event_exit_event()

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:37:35AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > 
> > commit ef54c1a476aef7eef26fe13ea10dc090952c00f8 upstream.
> > 
> > Make perf_event_exit_event() more robust, such that we can use it from
> > other contexts. Specifically the up and coming remove_on_exec.
> 
> Do we need this in 5.10? AFAICT the remove_on_exec work is not queued
> for 5.10, and this patch is buggy and needs following one to fix it
> up.

It's needed by the following patch, which says 5.10 is affected.