[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9ocuYZeG4Eh2PC37wDAgbd8K4c80NpNadXbfrJ-NoGaqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:12:15 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] random: remove batched entropy locking
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:57 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Does this compile and work?
It does, yes.
> From the looks of it, this should be:
>
> local_lock_irqsave(&batched_entropy_u64.lock, flags);
> batch = this_cpu_ptr(&batched_entropy_u64);
I wasn't aware you could reference percpu things statically like that
without going through the ptr helper. Anyway, I'll switch to yours, as
taking that lock prior seems better anyway.
>
> and we could do s/this_cpu_ptr/raw_cpu_ptr/
Ack.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists