[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73bad620-97eb-a734-cbc8-6f001d04c18a@canonical.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 18:39:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mfd/power/regulators: dt-bindings: max14577:
convert to dtschema
On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Changes since v1
> ================
> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
> additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
> current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
>
> Dependencies
> ============
> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
> checker won't complain about DTS.
> I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
>
> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
> patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.
>
Dear Lee,
This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists