lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bebedb9-644f-783d-492c-84a5de91720d@canonical.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Feb 2022 18:39:47 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd/extcon/regulators: max77843: add
 dtschema/bindings

On 11/01/2022 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The max77843 shares some parts with max77693 but it lacked bindings.  All
> its compatibles were undocumented.  Add basic bindings for max77843,
> matching existing devicetree.  These are not complete bindings, but
> rather reverse-engineered to match current state.
> 
> I do not have access to device with MAX77843, so if anyone else
> volunteers to be the bindings maintainer, please join.
> 
> Changes since v1
> ================
> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas.
> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
>    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
>    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
> 3. extcon: Use absolute path to schemas.
> 
> Dependencies
> ============
> 1. Patch 1/5 (dts): nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
>    checker won't complain about DTS.
>    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
> 
> 2. The patch 4/5 (mfd bindings) depends on regulator and extcon, so they
>    should come together (2+3+4+5).
> 
Dear Lee,

This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
you pick up patches 2-5 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ