linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd/extcon/regulators: max77843: add dtschema/bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgDnUNCNCO+JLyHU@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 09:33:04 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd/extcon/regulators: max77843: add
 dtschema/bindings

On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 11/01/2022 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The max77843 shares some parts with max77693 but it lacked bindings.  All
> > its compatibles were undocumented.  Add basic bindings for max77843,
> > matching existing devicetree.  These are not complete bindings, but
> > rather reverse-engineered to match current state.
> > 
> > I do not have access to device with MAX77843, so if anyone else
> > volunteers to be the bindings maintainer, please join.
> > 
> > Changes since v1
> > ================
> > 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas.
> > 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
> >    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
> >    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
> > 3. extcon: Use absolute path to schemas.
> > 
> > Dependencies
> > ============
> > 1. Patch 1/5 (dts): nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
> >    checker won't complain about DTS.
> >    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
> > 
> > 2. The patch 4/5 (mfd bindings) depends on regulator and extcon, so they
> >    should come together (2+3+4+5).
> > 
> Dear Lee,
> 
> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
> you pick up patches 2-5 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?

Are the subsystem maintainers not going to review/ack?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog