lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88fcdbe6-5fef-d9cc-a645-69e35230cdeb@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 10:47:00 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd/extcon/regulators: max77843: add
 dtschema/bindings

On 07/02/2022 10:33, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> On 11/01/2022 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The max77843 shares some parts with max77693 but it lacked bindings.  All
>>> its compatibles were undocumented.  Add basic bindings for max77843,
>>> matching existing devicetree.  These are not complete bindings, but
>>> rather reverse-engineered to match current state.
>>>
>>> I do not have access to device with MAX77843, so if anyone else
>>> volunteers to be the bindings maintainer, please join.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> ================
>>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas.
>>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
>>>    additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
>>>    current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
>>> 3. extcon: Use absolute path to schemas.
>>>
>>> Dependencies
>>> ============
>>> 1. Patch 1/5 (dts): nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
>>>    checker won't complain about DTS.
>>>    I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
>>>
>>> 2. The patch 4/5 (mfd bindings) depends on regulator and extcon, so they
>>>    should come together (2+3+4+5).
>>>
>> Dear Lee,
>>
>> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
>> you pick up patches 2-5 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?
> 
> Are the subsystem maintainers not going to review/ack?
> 

Would be nice to have them, but maybe since these are dt-bindings maybe
they were skipped? Or maybe it was the end-of-year holidays?

I can resend hoping it will trigger more acks. Do you wish me to resend?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ