[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68d1f184-bfc5-9d78-8c68-0c793b35adf4@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 10:43:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mfd/power/regulators: dt-bindings: max14577:
convert to dtschema
On 07/02/2022 10:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2022 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> ================
>>> 1. MFD: Use absolute path to schemas
>>> 2. Regulator: mention all allowed properties,
>>> additionalProperties=false, add min/max values for voltages and
>>> current, don't use patternProperties when not needed.
>>>
>>> Dependencies
>>> ============
>>> 1. DTS patch 1/4: nothing depends on it, sending here so Rob's automatic
>>> checker won't complain about DTS.
>>> I will take it via Samsung SoC tree.
>>>
>>> 2. Final MFD patch (4/4) depends on regulator and power, so the last
>>> patches (2+3+4) should go via same tree.
>>>
>> Dear Lee,
>>
>> This patchset was reviewed and there are no outstanding issues. Could
>> you pick up patches 2-4 (skipping DTS patch) via MFD tree?
>
> Nothing from Mark?
No, nothing. There is no other simultaneous work on these files, so I
don't expect conflicts here. Important part is that I got review from Rob.
If lack of ack makes you hesitant, I can resend hoping it will help but
it is a bit of pain.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists