[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yf+z6LmCsyymABcN@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 08:41:28 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Ameer Hamza <amhamza.mgc@...il.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, rickyman7@...il.com,
alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
leo.yan@...aro.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf session: check for null pointer before derefernce
Em Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:35:49AM +0000, James Clark escreveu:
>
>
> On 24/01/2022 20:29, Ameer Hamza wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:30:17PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24/01/2022 15:00, Ameer Hamza wrote:
> >>> Move null pointer check before dereferncing the variable
> >>>
> >>> Addresses-Coverity: 1497622 ("Derereference before null check")
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ameer Hamza <amhamza.mgc@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> tools/perf/util/session.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> >>> index f19348dddd55..e1014ab62c10 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> >>> @@ -1503,11 +1503,11 @@ static int machines__deliver_event(struct machines *machines,
> >>> ++evlist->stats.nr_unknown_id;
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> - dump_sample(evsel, event, sample, perf_env__arch(machine->env));
> >>> if (machine == NULL) {
> >>> ++evlist->stats.nr_unprocessable_samples;
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> + dump_sample(evsel, event, sample, perf_env__arch(machine->env));
> >>> return evlist__deliver_sample(evlist, tool, event, sample, evsel, machine);
> >>> case PERF_RECORD_MMAP:
> >>> return tool->mmap(tool, event, sample, machine);
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Ameer,
> >>
> >> This mistake was made recently, but I don't think your change is the desired behavior.
> >>
> >> It should be possible to dump stuff if machine is null. null or an empty string
> >> should be passed to dump_sample(). It looks like some of the printfs still attempt to
> >> show something in this case, although I didn't check them all.
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Thank you for your response. I understand your point.
> >
> > Do you think following changes would be ok?
>
> Yep looks good. With that change:
>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > index f19348dddd55..210eeee3dd70 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > @@ -1503,11 +1503,12 @@ static int machines__deliver_event(struct machines *machines,
> > ++evlist->stats.nr_unknown_id;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > - dump_sample(evsel, event, sample, perf_env__arch(machine->env));
> > if (machine == NULL) {
> > ++evlist->stats.nr_unprocessable_samples;
> > + dump_sample(evsel, event, sample, perf_env__arch(NULL));
> > return 0;
> > }
> > + dump_sample(evsel, event, sample, perf_env__arch(machine->env));
> > return evlist__deliver_sample(evlist, tool, event, sample, evsel, machine);
> > case PERF_RECORD_MMAP:
> > return tool->mmap(tool, event, sample, machine);
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hamza
> >
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists