linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/126] 5.16.8-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 07 Feb 2022 13:22:45 +0100
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/126] 5.16.8-rc1 review

On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 17:49 +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> > There are 126 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > linux-5.16.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Linux stable-rc 5.16 arm64 builds failed due to below errors.
> 
>   kvm/arm64: rework guest entry logic
>   [ Upstream commit 8cfe148a7136bc60452a5c6b7ac2d9d15c36909b ]
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit':
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:778:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'guest_state_enter_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_enter_irqoff'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   778 |         guest_state_enter_irqoff();
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |         guest_enter_irqoff
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:780:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'guest_state_exit_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_exit_irqoff'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   780 |         guest_state_exit_irqoff();
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |         guest_exit_irqoff
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c: In function 'kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run':
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:875:17: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'guest_timing_enter_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_enter_irqoff'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   875 |                 guest_timing_enter_irqoff();
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                 guest_enter_irqoff
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:925:17: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'guest_timing_exit_irqoff'; did you mean 'guest_exit_irqoff'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   925 |                 guest_timing_exit_irqoff();
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                 guest_exit_irqoff
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> 
> build link:
> -----------

I think this patch is missing:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87czk65vhq.wl-maz@kernel.org/T/#m49f8ab674c269f14f57dae33f90af30617bc735f

-- 
Nicolás Sáenz