[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgExAGEN91QEnObO@shikoro>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:47:28 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
nsaenz@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, stefan.wahren@...e.com,
nh6z@...z.net, eric@...olt.net, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: bcm2835: Fix the error handling in
'bcm2835_i2c_probe()'
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Some resource should be released if an error occurs in
> 'bcm2835_i2c_probe()'.
> Add an error handling path and the needed 'clk_disable_unprepare()' and
> 'clk_rate_exclusive_put()' calls.
>
> While at it, rework the bottom of the function to use this newly added
> error handling path and have an explicit and more standard "return 0;" at
> the end of the normal path.
>
> Fixes: bebff81fb8b9 ("i2c: bcm2835: Model Divider in CCF")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Sadly, noone tested it but I think it is good to avoid the resource
leaks. So, rebased and applied to for-next, thanks! Please kindly check
if I rebased correctly the irq error case (once I pushed out).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists