[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220208133957.GC112838@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:39:57 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
CC: Prasad Kumpatla <quic_pkumpatl@...cinc.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regmap-irq: Use regmap_irq_update_bits instead of
regmap_write
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:29:55PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Prasad,
>
> On 19.01.2022 15:29, Prasad Kumpatla wrote:
> > With the existing logic by using regmap_write() all the bits in
> > the register are being updated which is not expected. To update only the
> > interrupt raised bit and not tocuhing other bits, replace regmap_write()
> > with regmap_irq_update_bits().
> >
> > This patch is to fix the issue observed in MBHC button press/release events.
> >
> > Fixes: 3a6f0fb7b8eb ("regmap: irq: Add support to clear ack registers")
> > Signed-off-by: Prasad Kumpatla <quic_pkumpatl@...cinc.com>
>
> There is something wrong with this patch. Since it landed in linux-next
> (20220204) I get an interrupt storm on two of my test devices:
>
> 1. ARM 32bit Exynos4412-based Trats2 ("wm8994-codec wm8994-codec: FIFO
> error" message)
>
> 2. ARM 64bit Exynos5433-based TM2e ("arizona spi1.0: Mixer dropped
> sample" message)
>
> Definitely the interrupts are not acknowledged properly. Once I find
> some spare time, I will check it further which regmap configuration
> triggers the issue, but it is definitely related to this patch.
> Reverting it on top of current linux-next fixes the issue.
>
Yeah I was just looking at this patch it looks a bit weird. Like
most IRQ acks are write 1 to clear, so doing an update_bits seems
unlikely to work, as it will ack every pending interrupt. As the
whole idea of doing a regmap_write was to only write 1 to the bits
that need ACKed.
I suspect what is needed here is the inverted case wants an
update bits but the normal case needs to stay as a regmap_write.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists