[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220208152025.00d8e7ec@endymion.delvare>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:20:25 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, linux@...ck-us.net,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
rrichter@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com, sudheesh.mavila@....com,
Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com, Basavaraj.Natikar@....com,
Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com, Mario.Limonciello@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Replace cd6h/cd7h port I/O
accesses with MMIO accesses
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:00:31 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I'm still reviewing these, sorry. I only picked the first patch of the
> > series so that the sp5100_tco patches would build so I could test them.
>
> Ah, I see. I thought more than the first patch was needed for testing.
You need the full series to be on the safe side, otherwise there's a
risk that the two drivers will access the same registers using
different methods (legacy I/O vs MMIO) so there's no synchronization
and they could step on each other's toes.
However as I knew about this limitation, I was careful to not use the
SMBus driver while I was testing the watchdog driver :-)
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists