linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] regmap-irq: Use regmap_irq_update_bits instead of regmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:41:20 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Prasad Kumpatla <quic_pkumpatl@...cinc.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regmap-irq: Use regmap_irq_update_bits instead of
 regmap_write

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:33:16PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:56:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > My understanding was that they'd mixed interrupt handling in as a
> > bitfield in another register.

> Eek.. what a courageous choice. I guess that might work as
> long as there is only a single IRQ status bit in the register,
> if there are multiple bits this really needs more complex
> handling, like you basically need the old behaviour for the
> IRQ part of the register, and the new behaviour for the not
> IRQ part of the register. So perhaps a new mask to denote which
> bit of the register is being used for IRQ stuff?

Yeah, I think that's what I misread the code as doing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)