[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3bJcMKW5QJqoUT8jDe+cbK0A-zSbNZhveX0WwC=ZEUqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 08:06:38 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>,
Bing Yuan <Bing.Yuan@...opsys.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Kconfig CONFIG_FB dependency regression
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:42 PM Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com> wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 2/8/22 12:10, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> >> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On 2/3/22 19:21, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Ah.. It's because I don't use old.config as the base config. I use
> x86_64_defconfig as the base plus some additional configs I need, and it
> has CONFIG_FB_EFI set by default.
Does it hang if you just disable CONFIG_FB_EFI on an otherwise working
kernel? This is supposed to only disable the framebuffer, but it could be
the actual cause if something else depends on its presence.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists