lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:41:47 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC:     "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@...inx.com>,
        Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>, git <git@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function

Hi,

On 2/9/22 09:40, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:02 PM
>> To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>
>> Cc: wg@...ndegger.com; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; Michal
>> Simek <michals@...inx.com>; linux-can@...r.kernel.org;
>> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
>> <appanad@...inx.com>; Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>; git
>> <git@...inx.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function
>>
>> On 09.02.2022 08:29:55, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
>>>> On 08.02.2022 21:50:53, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
>>>>> Add check for NAPI poll function to avoid enabling interrupts with
>>>>> out completing the NAPI call.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the patch. Does this fix a bug? If so, please add a Fixes:
>>>> tag that lists the patch that introduced that bug.
>>>
>>> It is not a bug. I am adding additional safety check( Validating the
>>> return value of "napi_complete_done" call).
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. Should this go into can or can-next?
> 
> If possible please apply on both branches.

New feature should come to next. It means can-next please.

Thanks,
Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ