[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220210215128.GA998480@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:51:29 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 03/10] PCI/DOE: Add Data Object Exchange Aux Driver
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:57:38AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:58 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> [..]
> > > It just seems an unnecessary hunk of code for the core to carry when
> > > it's trivial for a client of the core to do:
> > >
> > > task->private = &completion;
> > > task->end_task = complete_completion;
> > > submit_task()
> > > wait_for_completion(&completion);
> >
> > OK, we can move this to the callers though function obviously will
> > also need renaming - I guess to pci_doe_exchange() and now need to take a
> > task rather than the exchange.
> >
> > I personally slightly prefer the layered approach, but don't care that
> > strongly.
>
> Like I said, you and Ira are holding the pen, so if you decide to keep
> the layering, just document the ontology somewhere and I'll let it go.
I'm busy with the PKS series ATM but I should get back to reviewing all these
comments soon.
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists