[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0242e383-5406-7504-ff3d-cf2e8dfaf8a3@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:54 -0600
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
brijesh.ksingh@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 21/45] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when
changing C-bit
On 2/11/22 8:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Simply have them always present. They will have !0 values on the
> respective guest types and 0 otherwise. This should simplify a lot of
> code and another unconditionally present u64 won't be the end of the
> world.
>
> Any other aspect I'm missing?
I think that's mostly about it. IIUC, the recommendation is to define a
new callback in x86_platform_op. The callback will be invoked
unconditionally; The default implementation for this callback is NOP;
The TDX and SEV will override with the platform specific implementation.
I think we may able to handle everything in one callback hook but having
pre and post will be a more desirable. Here is why I am thinking so:
* On SNP, the page must be invalidated before clearing the _PAGE_ENC
from the page table attribute
* On SNP, the page must be validated after setting the _PAGE_ENC in the
page table attribute.
~Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists