lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9198c43b-e5e2-fa58-5862-598dc7019ad6@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:34:58 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, kernelci@...ups.io,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] selftests: kvm: Remove absent target file

On 2/10/22 11:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/10/22 19:02, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>
>> I am fine with the change itself. For this patch:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>>
>> However, are we missing a vmx_pi_mmio_test and that test needs to be added.
>>
>> Just in case the test didn't make it into the 6a58150859fd and the intent
>> was to add it - hence the Makefile addition? This can be addressed in
>> another patch. Just want to make sure we aren't missing a test.
> 
> This was probably a rebase resolution issue.  The vmx_pi_mmio_test fails in the mainline tree, and is lingering in my tree together with the fix because somebody promised a better fix for it.  I included the TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 line by mistake when rebasing Peter Gonda's test below vmx_pi_mmio_test.
> 
> Thanks for the fix,
> 
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> 

Paolo,

Thank you for explaining the discrepancy. Would you like take
this through your tree? This patch depends on

commit: de1956f48543e90f94b1194395f33140898b39b2

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ