linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] selftests: kvm: Remove absent target file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9f1166d-78a0-1806-42bb-03f2e1671128@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 18:37:24 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, kernelci@...ups.io,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] selftests: kvm: Remove absent target file

On 2/11/22 18:34, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/10/22 11:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 2/10/22 19:02, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>
>>> I am fine with the change itself. For this patch:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>>>
>>> However, are we missing a vmx_pi_mmio_test and that test needs to be 
>>> added.
>>>
>>> Just in case the test didn't make it into the 6a58150859fd and the 
>>> intent
>>> was to add it - hence the Makefile addition? This can be addressed in
>>> another patch. Just want to make sure we aren't missing a test.
>>
>> This was probably a rebase resolution issue.  The vmx_pi_mmio_test 
>> fails in the mainline tree, and is lingering in my tree together with 
>> the fix because somebody promised a better fix for it.  I included the 
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 line by mistake when rebasing Peter Gonda's test 
>> below vmx_pi_mmio_test.
>>
>> Thanks for the fix,
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>
> 
> Paolo,
> 
> Thank you for explaining the discrepancy. Would you like take
> this through your tree? This patch depends on
> 
> commit: de1956f48543e90f94b1194395f33140898b39b2

Yes, of course.  Queued now.

Paolo