[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hwni1me12.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:52:41 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: "shunzhou.jiang@...ogic.com" <shunzhou.jiang@...ogic.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-amlogic <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
jbrunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
"jianxin.pan" <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: s4: Add support for power domains controller
Hi Shunzhou,
"shunzhou.jiang@...ogic.com" <shunzhou.jiang@...ogic.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin:
> Thanks your kindly reply
You're welcome. For future reference, please avoid top-posting. See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/2.Process.html?highlight=top-posting#mailing-lists
> For those domains, default is active, we hope not close when in use or not in use, in our case,
> only runtime PM (include suspend) control this, so set always on flag to avoid domain shutdown,
my question remains: why do want to keep these powered on even when they
are not in use?
The goal of the power-domain framework + runtime PM is to be able to
save power by turnin off power domains when they are not in use.
> if you also have concern, we can control this not in kernel, but this not our expect.
My strong preference is that this is controlled by the kernel.
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists