[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <140fc738-3391-5529-dd5a-c46b9e937355@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:49:03 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] virtio: queue_reset: struct virtio_config_ops
add callbacks for queue_reset
在 2022/2/9 下午8:28, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> Performing reset on a queue is divided into four steps:
>
> 1. reset_vq: reset one vq
> 2. recycle the buffer from vq by virtqueue_detach_unused_buf()
> 3. release the ring of the vq by vring_release_virtqueue()
> 4. enable_reset_vq: re-enable the reset queue
>
> So add two callbacks reset_vq, enable_reset_vq to struct
> virtio_config_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> include/linux/virtio_config.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> index 4d107ad31149..0d01a64f2576 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,17 @@ struct virtio_shm_region {
> * @set_vq_affinity: set the affinity for a virtqueue (optional).
> * @get_vq_affinity: get the affinity for a virtqueue (optional).
> * @get_shm_region: get a shared memory region based on the index.
> + * @reset_vq: reset a queue individually
This needs to be marked as optional I think.
> + * vq: the virtqueue
> + * Returns 0 on success or error status
It looks to me the caller should also guarantee that the vring is not
accsed by any functions e.g NAPI.
> + * After successfully calling this, be sure to call
> + * virtqueue_detach_unused_buf() to recycle the buffer in the ring, and
> + * then call vring_release_virtqueue() to release the vq ring.
> + * @enable_reset_vq: enable a reset queue
> + * vq: the virtqueue
> + * ring_num: specify ring num for the vq to be re-enabled. 0 means use the
> + * default value. MUST be a power of 2.
Note that we don't have power of 2 requirement for packed virtqueue.
And I wonder if it's cleaner to have a find_vq() ops instead to dealing
with the re-allocation and possible size change, or have a dedicated
helper to set vring size so driver can do.
reset_vq()
virtqueue_set_vring_size()
enable_reset_vq()
> + * Returns 0 on success or error status
> */
> typedef void vq_callback_t(struct virtqueue *);
> struct virtio_config_ops {
> @@ -100,6 +111,8 @@ struct virtio_config_ops {
> int index);
> bool (*get_shm_region)(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> struct virtio_shm_region *region, u8 id);
> + int (*reset_vq)(struct virtqueue *vq);
> + int (*enable_reset_vq)(struct virtqueue *vq, u16 ring_num);
Note that the current implement is best-effort, so it's not guarantee
that we can have a vring with ring_num, we may get less under memory
pressure or even fail. We probably need to have a pamater to mandate the
ring_num otherwise user may surprise to see a decreased size of the ring
when a increasing is actually requested.
Thanks
> };
>
> /* If driver didn't advertise the feature, it will never appear. */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists