[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b0b5f06-74eb-d6cb-07e2-38249e4cda92@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:05:40 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] virtio_pci: queue_reset: support
VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET
在 2022/2/9 下午8:29, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> This patch implements virtio pci support for QUEUE RESET.
>
> Performing reset on a queue is divided into these steps:
>
> 1. reset_vq: reset one vq
> 2. recycle the buffer from vq by virtqueue_detach_unused_buf()
> 3. release the ring of the vq by vring_release_virtqueue()
> 4. enable_reset_vq: re-enable the reset queue
>
> This patch implements reset_vq, enable_reset_vq in the pci scenario
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 8 +--
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 2 +
> include/linux/virtio.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> index cb01eb0cb2e4..303637ac4914 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> @@ -255,9 +255,11 @@ static void vp_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info = vp_dev->vqs[vq->index];
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
> - list_del(&info->node);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
> + if (!vq->reset) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
> + list_del(&info->node);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
> + }
>
> vp_dev->del_vq(info);
> kfree(info);
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> index d29d40bf0b45..cc45515eda50 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ static void vp_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev, u64 features)
> if ((features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV)) &&
> pci_find_ext_capability(pci_dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SRIOV))
> __virtio_set_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV);
> +
> + if (features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET))
> + __virtio_set_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET);
> }
>
> /* virtio config->finalize_features() implementation */
> @@ -176,6 +179,70 @@ static void vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> vp_disable_cbs(vdev);
> }
>
> +static int vp_modern_reset_vq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vq->vdev);
> + struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev = &vp_dev->mdev;
> + struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u16 msix_vec;
> +
> + if (!virtio_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + vp_modern_set_queue_reset(mdev, vq->index);
> +
> + info = vp_dev->vqs[vq->index];
> + msix_vec = info->msix_vector;
> +
> + /* Disable VQ callback. */
> + if (vp_dev->per_vq_vectors && msix_vec != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
> + disable_irq(pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, msix_vec));
I think we need a comment to explain why per_vq_mode needs to be dealt
with differently.
> +
> + /* delete vq */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
> + list_del(&info->node);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vp_dev->lock, flags);
So I don't see where vring is freed and vp_setup_vq() may try to
allocate new memory, won't it be a memory leak in this case?
Thanks
> +
> + vq->reset = true;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->node);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vp_modern_enable_reset_vq(struct virtqueue *vq, u16 ring_num)
> +{
> + struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vq->vdev);
> + struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev = &vp_dev->mdev;
> + struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info;
> + struct virtqueue *_vq;
> + u16 msix_vec;
> +
> + if (!vq->reset)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + /* check queue reset status */
> + if (vp_modern_get_queue_reset(mdev, vq->index) != 1)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + info = vp_dev->vqs[vq->index];
> + _vq = vp_setup_vq(vq->vdev, vq->index, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + info->msix_vector, ring_num);
> + if (IS_ERR(_vq)) {
> + vq->reset = true;
> + return PTR_ERR(_vq);
> + }
> +
> + vp_modern_set_queue_enable(&vp_dev->mdev, vq->index, true);
> +
> + msix_vec = vp_dev->vqs[vq->index]->msix_vector;
> + if (vp_dev->per_vq_vectors && msix_vec != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
> + enable_irq(pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, msix_vec));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static u16 vp_config_vector(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev, u16 vector)
> {
> return vp_modern_config_vector(&vp_dev->mdev, vector);
> @@ -231,10 +298,13 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> virtqueue_get_avail_addr(vq),
> virtqueue_get_used_addr(vq));
>
> - vq->priv = (void __force *)vp_modern_map_vq_notify(mdev, index, NULL);
> if (!vq->priv) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_map_notify;
> + vq->priv = (void __force *)vp_modern_map_vq_notify(mdev, index,
> + NULL);
> + if (!vq->priv) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_map_notify;
> + }
This seems unrelated or an artifact of previous patches?
Thanks
> }
>
> if (msix_vec != VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
> @@ -402,6 +472,8 @@ static const struct virtio_config_ops virtio_pci_config_nodev_ops = {
> .set_vq_affinity = vp_set_vq_affinity,
> .get_vq_affinity = vp_get_vq_affinity,
> .get_shm_region = vp_get_shm_region,
> + .reset_vq = vp_modern_reset_vq,
> + .enable_reset_vq = vp_modern_enable_reset_vq,
> };
>
> static const struct virtio_config_ops virtio_pci_config_ops = {
> @@ -420,6 +492,8 @@ static const struct virtio_config_ops virtio_pci_config_ops = {
> .set_vq_affinity = vp_set_vq_affinity,
> .get_vq_affinity = vp_get_vq_affinity,
> .get_shm_region = vp_get_shm_region,
> + .reset_vq = vp_modern_reset_vq,
> + .enable_reset_vq = vp_modern_enable_reset_vq,
> };
>
> /* the PCI probing function */
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index b8747df8dc1f..4f6028e1e2d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1731,6 +1731,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> vq->vq.vdev = vdev;
> vq->vq.num_free = num;
> vq->vq.index = index;
> + vq->vq.reset = false;
> vq->we_own_ring = true;
> vq->notify = notify;
> vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> @@ -2220,6 +2221,7 @@ static int __vring_init_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> vq->vq.vdev = vdev;
> vq->vq.num_free = vring.num;
> vq->vq.index = index;
> + vq->vq.reset = false;
> vq->we_own_ring = false;
> vq->notify = notify;
> vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> index dd1657c3a488..5d4817d79f3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct virtqueue {
> unsigned int index;
> unsigned int num_free;
> void *priv;
> + bool reset;
> };
>
> int virtqueue_add_outbuf(struct virtqueue *vq,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists