linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm64: Allocate guard pages near hyp stacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87leyd4k5q.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:06:41 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
Cc:     will@...nel.org, qperret@...gle.com, tabba@...gle.com,
        surenb@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm64: Allocate guard pages near hyp stacks

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:41:45 +0000,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
> 
> Allocate unbacked VA space underneath each stack page to ensure stack
> overflows get trapped and don't corrupt memory silently.
> 
> The stack is aligned to twice its size (PAGE_SIZE), meaning that any
> valid stack address has PAGE_SHIFT bit as 0. This allows us to easily
> check for overflow in the exception entry without corrupting any GPRs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
> [ Kalesh - Update commit text and comments,
>            refactor, add overflow handling ]
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c  | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S
> index 3d613e721a75..78e4b612ac06 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S
> @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__host_hvc)
>  
>  .macro invalid_host_el2_vect
>  	.align 7
> +
> +	/* Test stack overflow without corrupting GPRs */
> +	test_sp_overflow PAGE_SHIFT, .L__hyp_sp_overflow\@
> +

I am definitely concerned with this in a system not using pKVM (which
is on average 100% of the upstream users so far! ;-). This is more or
less guaranteed to do the wrong thing 50% of the times, depending on
the alignment of the stack.

>  	/* If a guest is loaded, panic out of it. */
>  	stp	x0, x1, [sp, #-16]!
>  	get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
> @@ -165,6 +169,18 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__host_hvc)
>  	 * been partially clobbered by __host_enter.
>  	 */
>  	b	hyp_panic
> +
> +.L__hyp_sp_overflow\@:
> +	/*
> +	 * Reset SP to the top of the stack, to allow handling the hyp_panic.
> +	 * This corrupts the stack but is ok, since we won't be attempting
> +	 * any unwinding here.
> +	 */
> +	ldr_this_cpu	x0, kvm_init_params + NVHE_INIT_STACK_HYP_VA, x1
> +	mov	sp, x0
> +
> +	bl	hyp_panic_bad_stack
> +	ASM_BUG()
>  .endm
>  
>  .macro invalid_host_el1_vect
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c
> index 99e178cf4249..114053dff228 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,24 @@ static int recreate_hyp_mappings(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		/* Map stack pages in the 'private' VA range */
> +		/*
> +		 * Allocate 'private' VA range for stack guard pages.
> +		 *
> +		 * The 'private' VA range grows upward and stacks downwards, so
> +		 * allocate the guard page first. But make sure to align the
> +		 * stack itself with PAGE_SIZE * 2 granularity to ease overflow
> +		 * detection in the entry assembly code.
> +		 */
> +		do {
> +			start = (void *)hyp_alloc_private_va_range(PAGE_SIZE);
> +			if (IS_ERR(start))
> +				return PTR_ERR(start);
> +		} while (IS_ALIGNED((u64) start, PAGE_SIZE * 2));

This seems cumbersome. Can't we tweak hyp_alloc_private_va_range() to
perform the required alignment? It could easily be convinced to return
an address that is aligned on the size of the region, which would
avoid this sort of loop.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.