lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:54:57 -0800
From:   Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Walbran <qwandor@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: arm64: Hypervisor stack enhancements

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:41 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:41:41 +0000,
> Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This series is based on v5.17-rc3 and adds the following stack features to
> > the KVM nVHE hypervisor:
> >
> > == Hyp Stack Guard Pages ==
> >
> > Based on the technique used by arm64 VMAP_STACK to detect overflow.
> > i.e. the stack is aligned to twice its size which ensure that the
> > 'stack shift' bit of any valid SP is 0. The 'stack shift' bit can be
> > tested in the exception entry to detect overflow without corrupting GPRs.
>
> Having quickly parsed the code, this seems to only be effective for
> pKVM and the EL2-allocated stack. Is there any technical reason not to
> implement this for the much more common case of 'classic' KVM in nVHE
> mode?

Hi Marc,

No technical reason. We hadn't thought of it from that perspective.
It's a good idea, I'll look into this and repost  a new version.

Thanks,
Kalesh

>
> Thanks,
>
>         M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists