linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:54:01 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert to
 dtschema

On 14/02/2022 17:43, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> +    required:
>> +      - regulator-name
> 
> Why is regulator-name required?  While it's a good idea for users to
> document names for supplies on their boards it shouldn't be a
> requirement or something that a driver would care about.

Indeed, there is no need for requiring the name. I guess I copied it
from other schemas.

I think this was not applied yet, so I'll send a v3.

Best regards,
Krzysztof