linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgqKix0h7T9ME/ub@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:59:55 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: maxim,max14577: convert
 to dtschema

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/02/2022 17:43, Mark Brown wrote:

> >> +    required:
> >> +      - regulator-name

> > Why is regulator-name required?  While it's a good idea for users to
> > document names for supplies on their boards it shouldn't be a
> > requirement or something that a driver would care about.

> Indeed, there is no need for requiring the name. I guess I copied it
> from other schemas.

Those other schemas should be fixed as well, if this is required for
anything then there's a problem - this is purely diagnostic information
for users.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)