[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b042424ce0e68f576fdab268adeeff90d48da8a8.camel@themaw.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:34:46 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: autofs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] autofs 5.1.8 release
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 08:59 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, Ian Kent wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's time for a release, autofs-5.1.8.
> >
> ...
> > - also require TCP_REQUESTED when setting NFS port.
>
> Unfortunately that last patch is buggy. TCP_REQUESTED is masked out
> in
> the caller.
Mmm ... sounds like I've made a mistake there.
I'll need to sort that out, thanks for pointing it out.
>
> Maybe the following is best.
>
> NeilBrown
>
> From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] Test TCP request correctly in nfs_get_info()
>
> The TCP_REQUESTED flag is masked out by the caller, so it never gets
> to
> nfs_get_info().
That wasn't my intent, I'll need to look at it again.
The case I'm trying to cover is fairly specific so I will need to
look at it again.
Ian
> We can test if TCP was requested by examining the 'proto' parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
>
> diff --git a/modules/replicated.c b/modules/replicated.c
> index 09075dd0c1b4..3ac7ee432e73 100644
> --- a/modules/replicated.c
> +++ b/modules/replicated.c
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static unsigned int get_nfs_info(unsigned logopt,
> struct host *host,
>
> rpc_info->proto = proto;
> if (port < 0) {
> - if ((version & NFS4_REQUESTED) && (version &
> TCP_REQUESTED))
> + if ((version & NFS4_REQUESTED) && (proto ==
> IPPROTO_TCP))
> rpc_info->port = NFS_PORT;
> else
> port = 0;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists