[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <164487880421.17471.502085345359040789@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:46:44 +1100
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Ian Kent" <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: autofs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] autofs 5.1.8 release
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 08:59 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > It's time for a release, autofs-5.1.8.
> > >
> > ...
> > > - also require TCP_REQUESTED when setting NFS port.
> >
> > Unfortunately that last patch is buggy. TCP_REQUESTED is masked out
> > in
> > the caller.
>
> Mmm ... sounds like I've made a mistake there.
> I'll need to sort that out, thanks for pointing it out.
>
> >
> > Maybe the following is best.
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> > From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Test TCP request correctly in nfs_get_info()
> >
> > The TCP_REQUESTED flag is masked out by the caller, so it never gets
> > to
> > nfs_get_info().
>
> That wasn't my intent, I'll need to look at it again.
> The case I'm trying to cover is fairly specific so I will need to
> look at it again.
>
I'm curious: What was the case you were trying to solve?? I couldn't
guess any justification for the change.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists