[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ygu9xtrMxxq36FRH@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:50:46 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Provide and use generic_handle_irq_safe() where
appropriate.
On 2022-02-15 14:36:01 [+0000], Lee Jones wrote:
> Do we really need to coordinate this series cross-subsystem?
I would suggest to merge it via irq subsystem but I leave the logistics
to tglx.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists