| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <mqen0ht146rbtukbd47tbtbiqvsmfta8oa@4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:50:36 +0000
From: John Cox <jc@...esim.co.uk>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mripard@...nel.org, paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com, wens@...e.org,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
jonas@...boo.se, nicolas@...fresne.ca, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...labora.com, knaerzche@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 6/8] media: uapi: Remove bit_size field from v4l2_ctrl_hevc_slice_params
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:35:12 +0100, you wrote:
>
>Le 15/02/2022 à 15:17, John Cox a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>>> The bit size of the slice could be deduced from the buffer payload
>>> so remove bit_size field to avoid duplicated the information.
>> I think this is a bad idea. In the future we are (I hope) going to want
>> to have an array (variable) of slice headers all referring to the same
>> bit buffer. When we do that we will need this field.
>
>I wonder if that could be considering like another decode mode and so
>use an other control ?
I, personally, would be in favour of making the slice header control a
variable array just as it is. If userland can't cope with multiple
entries then just send them one at a time and the code looks exactly
like it does at the moment and if the driver can't then set max array
entries to 1.
Having implemented this in rpi port of ffmpeg and the RPi V4L2 driver I
can say with experience that the code and effort overhead is very low.
Either way having a multiple slice header control in the UAPI is
important for efficiency.
Regards
John Cox
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst | 3 ---
>>> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h265.c | 11 ++++-------
>>> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h | 3 +--
>>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
>>> index 3296ac3b9fca..c3ae97657fa7 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
>>> @@ -2965,9 +2965,6 @@ enum v4l2_mpeg_video_hevc_size_of_length_field -
>>> :stub-columns: 0
>>> :widths: 1 1 2
>>>
>>> - * - __u32
>>> - - ``bit_size``
>>> - - Size (in bits) of the current slice data.
>>> * - __u32
>>> - ``data_bit_offset``
>>> - Offset (in bits) to the video data in the current slice data.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h265.c b/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h265.c
>>> index 8ab2d9c6f048..db8c7475eeb8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h265.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h265.c
>>> @@ -312,8 +312,8 @@ static void cedrus_h265_setup(struct cedrus_ctx *ctx,
>>> const struct v4l2_hevc_pred_weight_table *pred_weight_table;
>>> unsigned int width_in_ctb_luma, ctb_size_luma;
>>> unsigned int log2_max_luma_coding_block_size;
>>> + size_t slice_bytes;
>>> dma_addr_t src_buf_addr;
>>> - dma_addr_t src_buf_end_addr;
>>> u32 chroma_log2_weight_denom;
>>> u32 output_pic_list_index;
>>> u32 pic_order_cnt[2];
>>> @@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ static void cedrus_h265_setup(struct cedrus_ctx *ctx,
>>>
>>> cedrus_write(dev, VE_DEC_H265_BITS_OFFSET, 0);
>>>
>>> - reg = slice_params->bit_size;
>>> - cedrus_write(dev, VE_DEC_H265_BITS_LEN, reg);
>>> + slice_bytes = vb2_get_plane_payload(&run->src->vb2_buf, 0);
>>> + cedrus_write(dev, VE_DEC_H265_BITS_LEN, slice_bytes);
>> I think one of these must be wrong. bit_size is in bits,
>> vb2_get_plane_payload is in bytes?
>
>You are right it should be vb2_get_plane_payload() * 8 to get the size in bits.
>
>I will change that in v3.
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John Cox
>>
>>> /* Source beginning and end addresses. */
>>>
>>> @@ -384,10 +384,7 @@ static void cedrus_h265_setup(struct cedrus_ctx *ctx,
>>>
>>> cedrus_write(dev, VE_DEC_H265_BITS_ADDR, reg);
>>>
>>> - src_buf_end_addr = src_buf_addr +
>>> - DIV_ROUND_UP(slice_params->bit_size, 8);
>>> -
>>> - reg = VE_DEC_H265_BITS_END_ADDR_BASE(src_buf_end_addr);
>>> + reg = VE_DEC_H265_BITS_END_ADDR_BASE(src_buf_addr + slice_bytes);
>>> cedrus_write(dev, VE_DEC_H265_BITS_END_ADDR, reg);
>>>
>>> /* Coding tree block address */
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
>>> index b1a3dc05f02f..27f5d272dc43 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
>>> @@ -2457,7 +2457,6 @@ struct v4l2_hevc_pred_weight_table {
>>> #define V4L2_HEVC_SLICE_PARAMS_FLAG_DEPENDENT_SLICE_SEGMENT (1ULL << 9)
>>>
>>> struct v4l2_ctrl_hevc_slice_params {
>>> - __u32 bit_size;
>>> __u32 data_bit_offset;
>>>
>>> /* ISO/IEC 23008-2, ITU-T Rec. H.265: NAL unit header */
>>> @@ -2484,7 +2483,7 @@ struct v4l2_ctrl_hevc_slice_params {
>>> /* ISO/IEC 23008-2, ITU-T Rec. H.265: Picture timing SEI message */
>>> __u8 pic_struct;
>>>
>>> - __u8 reserved;
>>> + __u8 reserved[5];
>>>
>>> /* ISO/IEC 23008-2, ITU-T Rec. H.265: General slice segment header */
>>> __u32 slice_segment_addr;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists