linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: Introduce common module to instantiate CCGx UCSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:41:01 +0000
From:   Ajay Gupta <ajayg@...dia.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@....com>,
        Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
        Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: Introduce common module to instantiate CCGx
 UCSI

Hi Wolfram and Andy,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 4:46 AM
> To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>;
> Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>; Ajay Gupta
> <ajayg@...dia.com>; Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <nehal-
> bakulchandra.shah@....com>; Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>;
> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>; Sameer Pujar
> <spujar@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: Introduce common module to instantiate
> CCGx UCSI
> 
> 
> > Maybe we should orphan the driver if no-one response in meaningful
> > time (let's say till the next merge window)?
Sorry for the late response. The series looks good to me. I don't have setup ready
to test the changes but will be able to test next week and let you know if there is
any issues.

Thanks
Ajay
> nvpublic
> 
> Yes, I had a similar idea.