linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: f_uvc: fix superspeedplus transfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ca9a5a8.ae1fb.17f0061243d.Coremail.3090101217@zju.edu.cn>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:34:00 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:   冷静 <3090101217@....edu.cn>
To:     "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     balbi@...nel.org, jleng@...arella.com,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: f_uvc: fix superspeedplus transfer

Hi Greg KH,

Sorry for the trouble, as a new contributor to kernel.
Although I have readed the document that how to submit patches,
I'm still missing some details.

> What does "call trace" here mean?  Is this an error?  Something else?
It is "call trace" when the kernel accessed NULL pointer and handed.

> You did not read the information that my bot told you to read, for how
> to properly version your patches :(
> 
> Please go back and do so when you resend all of them.
> 
> Also this is not a patch series?  Why not?

I readed the bot told, but I still missed it.
The new patch only adds more detailed patch description.
So it is not a patch series.

thanks,

Jing Leng