lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgxtGWh0b9NXTyu8@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:18:49 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Andre Kalb <andre.kalb@....de>, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        senozhatsky@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Set console_set_on_cmdline=1 when
 __add_preferred_console() is called with user_specified == true

On (22/02/15 19:10), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> We should add a comment explaining the less obvious behavior as
> discussed in the thread. Something like:
> 
> > +static void set_user_specified(struct console_cmdline *c, bool user_specified)
> > +{
> > +	if (!user_specified)
> > +		return;
> > +
> 	/*
> 	 * @c console was defined by the user on the command line.
> 	 * Do not clear when added twice also by SPCR or the device tree.
> 	 */
> > +	c->user_specified = true;
> 	/* At least one console defined by the user on the command line. */
> > +	console_set_on_cmdline = 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int __add_preferred_console(char *name, int idx, char *options,
> >  				   char *brl_options, bool user_specified)
> >  {
> 
> With the above comments:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> 
> Sergey, is it enough from your POV, please?

Yes, Petr. Thank you.

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ