[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220216031957.9761-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:19:57 +0800
From: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: pmladek@...e.com
Cc: senozhatsky@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org, anton@...msg.org,
ccross@...roid.com, tony.luck@...el.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com, wedsonaf@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] printk: make suppress_panic_printk static
This symbol is not used outside of printk.c, so marks it static.
Fix the following sparse warning:
kernel/printk/printk.c:100:19: warning: symbol 'suppress_panic_printk'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 7a9eace19191..703397cadd01 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int __read_mostly suppress_printk;
* During panic, heavy printk by other CPUs can delay the
* panic and risk deadlock on console resources.
*/
-int __read_mostly suppress_panic_printk;
+static int __read_mostly suppress_panic_printk;
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
static struct lockdep_map console_lock_dep_map = {
--
2.20.1.7.g153144c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists