lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:49:02 +0100
From:   Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To:     Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V12 1/3] NUMA Balancing: add page promotion counter

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 03:38:13PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> In a system with multiple memory types, e.g. DRAM and PMEM, the CPU
> and DRAM in one socket will be put in one NUMA node as before, while
> the PMEM will be put in another NUMA node as described in the
> description of the commit c221c0b0308f ("device-dax: "Hotplug"
> persistent memory for use like normal RAM").  So, the NUMA balancing
> mechanism will identify all PMEM accesses as remote access and try to
> promote the PMEM pages to DRAM.
> 
> To distinguish the number of the inter-type promoted pages from that
> of the inter-socket migrated pages.  A new vmstat count is added.  The
> counter is per-node (count in the target node).  So this can be used
> to identify promotion imbalance among the NUMA nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>
> Cc: osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Cc: zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> ---
...

> @@ -2072,6 +2072,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
>  	int isolated;
>  	int nr_remaining;
> +	int nr_succeeded;

I think we should make this consistent and make it "unsigned int".
That is what migrate_pages() expects, and what the other caller using
nr_succeeded (demote_page_list()) already uses.
Unless there is a strong reason not to do so.

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>


-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ